
Researchers have called on US food safety authorities to regulate arsenic levels in rice, following a report on the risk associated with the contaminant.
The study, which concentrated on the potentially harmful exposure for pregnant women to arsenic, concluded that setting safe legal levels of the contaminant in foodstuffs was essential to protect public health.
Heavy metal arsenic, which is found naturally in the environment, has been linked to several adverse health effects including cancer and cardiovascular disease.
There is also increasing concern over the effects of low-dosage exposure to the heavy metal.
There are currently no safe legal limits on the amount of arsenic in rice products in the US or in Europe.
It is imperative that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) produce further guidance on safe levels of the heavy metal in rice, added the report.
Further guidance
“There are no statutory limits for the arsenic content of food sold in the United States and European Union, in stark contrast to China, where the maximum safe level of inorganic arsenic in rice is 0.15μg/g (parts per billion [ppb]),” said the study.
Although no safe legal levels have been set in Europe or the US, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has “stressed the need for more data on levels of organic and inorganic arsenic in different foodstuffs, as well as on the relationship between arsenic intake levels and possible health effects,” said the organisation’s website.
The FDA recently recognised the potential health risks associated with arsenic contamination in apple, but no guidance has been set on rice to-date.
“Setting such limits would protect consumers from unknowingly purchasing rice or rice products with high levels of arsenic,” added the report.
“Given the potentially adverse health consequences of arsenic at low levels of exposure, it is imperative that the health impact of arsenic exposure through rice consumption be characterised.”
“Our findings along with others indicate that rice consumption should be considered when designing arsenic reduction strategies in the United States.”
Seriously considering guidance
This report comes after FoodQualityNews.com reported how the FDA was poised to develop new guidelines on the safe legal levels of arsenic in apple juice.
The FDA potential regulation update came as a result of food safety concerns from a consumer group which conducted its own testing for arsenic in apple juice.
Current guidelines dictate that apple juice containing more than 23ppb of organic arsenic represent a potential health risk.
The FDA announced in a reply to the consumer group that it is “seriously considering setting guidance or other level for inorganic arsenic in apple juice and are collecting all relevant information to evaluate and determine an appropriate level.”




2 comments (Comments are now closed)
Rice in pet foods
Many pet foods contain rice. Especially the ones that don't contain GMOs, corn, soy, wheat, harmful additives, preservatives, etc. I doubt that the US government will regulate arsenic in pets foods, even if they ever do get around to paying attention to arsenic in people food. I'm sure that food industry will block any attempt to make our food supply safer. Profits before people and pets is the name of the game. No wonder there are so many cancers in people, dogs and cats. Carcinogens in the food, water, air, soil, and everything else.
Report abuse
Posted by DJ
06 December 2011 | 20h15
Way more arsenic in chicken than rice!
All this fuss over rice and apple juice is missing the astronomical exposure, by comparison, from chicken consumption. There's well under 100 ppb of arsenic in apple juice and rice, but USDA researchers have estimated that chicken may harbor as much as 430 ppb -- and not the naturally-occurring kind of arsenic either. The prestigious Medical Letter on the Centers for Disease Control and the Food and Drug Administration concluded, “Chicken consumption may contribute significant amounts of arsenic to total arsenic exposure of the U.S. population….Levels of arsenic in chicken are so high that other sources may have to be monitored carefully to prevent undue toxic exposure among the population.”
Report abuse
Posted by Kelly
06 December 2011 | 20h13