SUBSCRIBE

Breaking News on Food Safety & Quality Control

News > R&D

Changing Listeria contamination patterns analysed in cheese facility

Post a comment

By Joe Whitworth+

27-Aug-2014
Last updated on 27-Aug-2014 at 11:59 GMT

Learning from Listeria in a cheese processing plant

The sources of Listeria monocytogenes contamination and its changing patterns in a fresh cheese processing plant have been investigated by researchers.

The study analysed changing L. monocytogenes environmental contamination patterns in an Austrian cheese processing facility from 2010 to 2013.

Overall Listeria spp. occurrence rate was 21.9%, dominated by L. monocytogenes (19.5%).

Although susceptible to a range of disinfectants and cleaners, one dominant L. monocytogenes sequence type (ST5) could not be eradicated from drains and floors.

The plant produces fresh cheese produces, ripened brine curd cheese and semi-hard cheeses, all made from pasteurized cow, ewe and goat milk.

It comprised of one compartment for production of fresh cheese products, including rooms for preparation of raw materials and a cooling chamber (BI), an extension building, mainly for dairy processing (yogurt, semi-hard cheese processing, fresh cheese processing) (BII), and one for storage and preparation of raw materials (BIII).

Samples tested 

Sampling included non-food contact surfaces (NFCS; drain water, floors, walls, tables, trays, and trolleys), food-contact surfaces (FCS; e.g. fillers, molds, milk vats, slicers; tables, trays, and trolleys), and gloves, work aprons and shoes from dairy staff.

A total of 1,284 environmental samples were tested for the presence or absence of Listeria spp. including L. monocytogenes.

183 drain water and 1101 swab samples were taken from three compartments of the facility.

All samples were transported to the laboratory of the Institute of Milk Hygiene, Milk Technology and Food Science (IMMF) and investigated immediately.

15.3% of the samples were contaminated with L. monocytogenes, 3.4% contained Listeria species mixtures (L. monocytogenes, L. innocua, and L. welshimeri), and 0.9%, mainly floor and drain samples, contained L. monocytogenes mixtures.

L. monocytogenes PFGE types in building compartments (BI, BII, and BIII) investigated. PFGE types marked with an asterisk are listed in gray boxes and frequencies of isolation are shown in brackets

The study was complemented by epidemiological tools for strain characterization, recording changes in hygiene management strategies, susceptibility tests of recurrently isolated L. monocytogenes strains to disinfectants and cleaners and survival experiments during storage on the food matrix.

Characterization of L. monocytogenes isolates included genotyping by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and multi-locus sequence typing (MLST).

Identical L. monocytogenes genotypes were found in the food processing environment (FPE), raw materials and in products.

Sampling phases

FCS swabs from fillers were mainly positive for L. monocytogenes (4.7%) in the first sampling phase.

After improving hygiene management, e.g. strict compartmentalization of the hygiene areas, and staff training, e.g. following to one-way traffic routes and correct usage of hygiene locks, FCS were Listeria spp. negative.

In subsequent monitoring, extensions and reconstructions of the facility took place.

Further testing of NFCS (conveyor belts, transport trolleys, pallets, and tables) resulted in 1.4% of samples positive for L. monocytogenes.

The processing environment (drains, walls, doors and floors) was found to be L. monocytogenes positive during the whole investigation (15.8%).

L. monocytogenes contamination spread from the processing environment in building compartment BI to BII. As floor contamination increased, shoes were frequently found to be positive (48.4%).

The third contamination scenario in the final phase (2012-2013) was reduction to one predominant genotype FCP7 (ST5), with occasional detection of FCP12 (ST204) in the drains and on the floors.

In general, all L. monocytogenes test strains were susceptible to peracetic acid (MIC 250 mg/l), H2O2 (MIC 125 mg/l), Prodesan PE 15 and Citrosan (MIC 500 mg/l), and Rimalkan (MIC 15714 mg/l).

Source: International Journal of Food Microbiology

Online ahead of print, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.08.001

L. monocytogenes in a cheese processing facility: Learning from contamination scenarios over three years of sampling”

Authors: I. Rückerl, M. Muhterem-Uyar, S. Muri-Klinger, K.-H. Wagner, M. Wagner, B. Stessl  

Subscribe to our FREE newsletter

Get FREE access to authoritative breaking news, videos, podcasts, webinars and white papers. SUBSCRIBE

Post a comment

Comment title *
Your comment *
Your name *
Your email *

We will not publish your email on the site

I agree to Terms and Conditions

These comments have not been moderated. You are encouraged to participate with comments that are relevant to our news stories. You should not post comments that are abusive, threatening, defamatory, misleading or invasive of privacy. For the full terms and conditions for commenting see clause 7 of our Terms and Conditions ‘Participating in Online Communities’. These terms may be updated from time to time, so please read them before posting a comment. Any comment that violates these terms may be removed in its entirety as we do not edit comments. If you wish to complain about a comment please use the "REPORT ABUSE" button or contact the editors.

Key Industry Events

 

Access all events listing

Our events, Events from partners...