Vitamin Analysis: New Methods for Improving Data Quality & Laboratory Productivity
Waters
Please fill in the box below to tell us why you feel the post breaks our rules. When you are finished, click on "Send" so that it can be reviewed by a moderator.
Spotlight
  Global Food Safety Conference 2013 in BarcelonaCo-ordination is vital in food safety, says CDC expertCo-ordinating food safety between the different agencies and states is “the big challenge”, according to the chief... |
 Virus weaponry versus post-harvest germs gains momentumKilling pathogens by applying bacteriophages to food surfaces is gaining momentum, but several challenges must be overcome... |
 E-beam tech on oysters can reduce foodborne illness, says studyElectron beam pasteurization of raw oysters can significantly reduce food poisoning, according to research from Texas A&M... |
 Hepatitis A outbreak in EU linked to frozen berriesAn outbreak of hepatitis A in four EU countries has sickened at least 71 people with the... |
 Salmonella linked to cucumber sickens more than 70An outbreak of salmonella in cucumbers has sickened 73 people and led to the products from the... |
Hold on
In your lead-in paragraph you say that the FDA is poised to do a U-turn, but after that all I read is that the FDA is doing due dilligance investigation. No talk about them lowering inorganic Arsenic levels or imposing total Arsenic limits... So what/where is the U-turn?
The Oz-testing still doesn't talk about ratios of organic and inorganic Arsenic in their total Arsenic levels.
I used to like Oz, but he's stepped across a professional boundery here and he is trying to make statements in an area that is well outside of his expertise. The man is an MD not a toxicologist
Posted by Eric
30 November 2011 | 16h22