Derived from fungi and mold, these toxins can occur in crops in the field prior to harvest and in foods, nuts, and feeds that are improperly stored or exposed to moisture.
Because they are nearly impossible to prevent, the American Phytopathological Society, which studies plant diseases, estimates that mycotoxins and their derivative aflatoxins infect up to 25% of the world’s food crops. That results in the loss of one billion metric tons of food every year and billions of dollars in lost revenue.
The impact on farmers and agricultural economies around the world is staggering.
In fact, the World Health Organization recently stated that “human health is the most significant impact of mycotoxins, with significant losses in monetary terms (through health care costs and productivity loss) and in human lives lost.”
Aflatoxins and milk
Bred specifically for their ability to yield large quantities of milk, each dairy cow regularly produces more than 20,000 pounds of milk a year.
In order to produce that much milk, dairy cows need to eat about 120 pounds of wet food, or about 55 pounds of dry food, every day. Their feed usually includes hay and grain.
The grain potion is a mixture of soybean meal, minerals, corn, and vitamins.
These aflatoxins are particularly resilient compounds, and are hard to eradicate, even after sterilization and pasteurization.
Since first discovering aflatoxins in the 1960s, researchers found milk to be the primary carrier of these toxins in human diet. These compounds can be present in all forms of milk, from yogurt, cheese, and any milk-based processed food, as well as infant formula and mother’s breast milk. Since children consume more milk by body weight than adults, they are particularly at risk.
The regulatory front
To protect the public, regulatory agencies in most developed countries have set limits on the amount of aflatoxin M1 in human food and milk. The problem is that these limits are not uniform in the global economy. The EU, for example, has set a limit of 0.05 parts per billion (ppb) for the toxin in milk. The US limit is significantly more tolerant, setting the limit at 0.5 ppb. Other countries in South America, Asia, and Africa, meanwhile, have no limits at all.
There is also the issue of global enforcement. For instance, in the US, the dairy and food industries self-regulate the monitoring of aflatoxins in their products. While that arrangement works reasonably well, there are several other aflatoxins beyond M1 that may also be found in milk and which have no established maximum levels.
Another challenge is purely practical. Aflatoxins are difficult to accurately measure in large quantities of foods, grains, and milk without the proper instruments and training.
PerkinElmer's bead-based AlphaLISA® immunoassay technology is designed for the detection of analytes in biological samples. Used with the PerkinElmer Aflatoxin AlphaLISA® Detection Kit, this is well suited for large assay platforms such as the PerkinElmer EnVision® and VICTOR® systems that can test many samples simultaneously without the loss of its sensitivity, dynamic range, or performance.
BiooScientific standard ELISA Kit, the MaxSignal® Aflatoxin M1 ELISA Test Kit in both fast and extra sensitivity varieties.
There are several methods available to test for mycotoxins and aflatoxins in food, feed, and milk.
For rapid field and lab testing, Bioo Scientific, a PerkinElmer company, has developed AuroFlow™ Aflatoxin M1 test strips, treated with gold particles, for rapid detection of the M1 toxin in milk.
While this technique provides a quick, onsite analysis of cow’s milk, for lab based lower level detection of aflatoxins in milk immunochemical methods using enzyme-lined immunosorbent assays (ELISA), high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and LC/MS/MS (liquid chromatography, triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry) are the recommended techniques.
Each has its own advantages, and sometimes disadvantages.
Here is a closer look at a few of these options.
Immunochemical Method: ELISA
This method requires some understanding of chromatographic principles to solve potential separation and interference problems.
It is often the preferred method for testing aflatoxin in cheese.
High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)
In testing milk and its affiliated products for aflatoxins, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) is the global gold standard. It is employed in more than 80% of organic analyses, and is often coupled with UV absorption, fluorescence, mass spectrometry, and amperometric detectors.
PerkinElmer Altus® HPLC system. Used with the Altus® A-10 Fluoresence Detector and BioScientific’s AflaPure™ M1 Aflatoxin and AflaPure™ M1 Aflatoxin Rapid imunoaffinity chromatography columns. This technology achieves the EU’s very low control limit for detecting M1 aflatoxin in raw milk in less than six minutes.
It allows lab personnel to effectively separate and quantify a wide range of aflatoxins, including B1, B2, G1, G2, and M1, down to 0.02 ppb… well below the current allowable concentration limit.
Liquid chromatography, triple quadruple tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS)
Finally, LCMSMS offers the highest quantitative sensitivity and the ability to analyze multiple species at once. These technologies can deliver PPT level limits of quantitation however these technologies are typically higher cost.
FAO, “Worldwide Regulations For Mycotoxins In Food And Feed In 2003,” Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, http://www.fao.org/docrep/007/y5499e/y5499e00.htm, accessed September 12, 2016.