Special Edition: Lab Technology

Vicam lateral flow evaluated to determine aflatoxins in maize

By Joseph James Whitworth contact

- Last updated on GMT

Picture: iStock/Nolmedrano99
Picture: iStock/Nolmedrano99
Analytical performance of a lateral flow immunoassay from Vicam, owned by Waters, for determination of aflatoxins in maize has been evaluated.

The validation study for the AFLA-V AQUA provided information on the method precision profile, cut off values and false suspect and false negative rates.

The aim was to evaluate the analytical performances of a commercial lateral flow device (LFD) to determine aflatoxins in maize after water-based extraction, according to Commission Regulation (EU) No. 519/2014.

Validation study results

Total precision for contaminated samples varied from 14%-29%. Cut off values calculated considering 2 μg kg−1 or 4 μg kg−1 as the screening target concentration (STC) were 1.24 and 2.18 μg kg−1, respectively, whereas the false suspect rate for blanks was 42% and 8%, respectively.

False negative rate for samples containing the target analytes above the screening target concentrations was <1% in all statistical evaluation.

This is in compliance with the maximum 5% set in Commission Decision 657/2002/EC and Regulation 519/2014/EU.

Analysis of naturally contaminated maize samples performed by using a LFD and the AOAC official method revealed a good correlation (parameters of the linear regression: r = 0.97, slope = 0.96) between results.

A satisfactory agreement between reference values and test results was found in the analysis of reference materials.

In the US, an action level of 20 μg kg−1 of aflatoxins has been set by the US Food and Drug Administration.

In the European Union maximum permitted levels are 2 μg kg−1 Aflatoxin B1 and 4 μg kg−1 total aflatoxins.

Outside the lab with screening tests

Screening tests can play an important role in safety monitoring of food and feed chains, allowing rapid decision making and interventions and affecting the final product price.

The use of LFDs with water-based extraction protocols eliminates the use of hazardous solvents and makes them more practical for assays to be performed outside the lab.

In the study, each sample set included 25 samples belonging to three maize batches with different origins.

Negative samples contained Aflatoxin B1 at levels lower than 0.5 μg kg−1 (i.e. the LOQ of the LC-MS/MS method), whereas two positive sample sets were prepared containing Aflatoxin B1 at about 2 and 4 μg kg−1, respectively.

For the blank samples, a high relative standard deviation of the test response was seen but an acceptable rate of false positive results for these samples was obtained.

Contribution of the matrix-to-matrix variation was not surprising considering the extract was applied to the LFD without dilution.

“However the overall precision <30% indicated an acceptable robustness of the method, also taking into consideration the low target levels of AFB1 considered for validation.”

Performances at the STC of 2 μg kg−1, in spite of having an adequate cut off value, found the screening method had a high rate of false suspect results (42%) for the blanks.

“A high false positive rate may affect the economic benefit of the test, because false suspect results require the application of confirmatory methods to samples that are actually compliant with legal or target levels.

“The lateral flow test being less expensive and organic solvent free, and requiring less time and skills, the overall balance of the pros (costs and time) and cons (42% false positive) could be still positive.”

Source: Analytical Methods, 2018, 10, 123-130

Validation of a lateral flow immunoassay for the rapid determination of aflatoxins in maize by solvent free extraction​”

Authors: Veronica M. T. Lattanzio, Natascia Guarducci, Stephen Powers, Biancamaria Ciasca, Michelangelo Pascale and Christoph von Holst 

Related news

Show more

Related products

Related suppliers

comments

Post your comment

We will not publish your email address on the website

These comments have not been moderated. You are encouraged to participate with comments that are relevant to our news stories. You should not post comments that are abusive, threatening, defamatory, misleading or invasive of privacy. For the full terms and conditions for commenting see clause 7 of our Terms and Conditions ‘Participating in Online Communities’. These terms may be updated from time to time, so please read them before posting a comment. Any comment that violates these terms may be removed in its entirety as we do not edit comments. If you wish to complain about a comment please use the "REPORT ABUSE" button or contact the editors.